User talk:Minermatt122514
Add topic|
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Alex Pretti Official Portrait High Quality.jpg has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:06, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
[edit]| I had already been searching for too long for possible articles about the AI image for my long comment. At the end of it I really didn't feel like trying to verify Megyn's unsourced claims. So I was really glad to see you had done just that! |
New 9/11 Hijacker images
[edit]Very good work with the uploads of the higher quality images and license transcripts of the 9/11 hijacker-pilots. I am curious as to how you found them. About Atta's attire in [Atta 5-2-01 HQ.jpg|this image], he appears to be wearing some sort of collared shirt (Likely a dress shirt) of black or dark reddish color over a white T-shirt, not a suit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enginemen (talk • contribs) 17:16, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
- Here is how I was able to obtain these. I was going through the prosecution evidence in the Zacarias Moussaoui trial which you can find here. https://coop.vaed.uscourts.gov/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution.html
- I found some Adobe Flash presentations (exhibit numbers OG00010 and OG00011). Most of the high-quality images I got came from the presentations in exhibit OG00011 which discussed the hijackers cell phone calls. I have a computer program that can extract assets from Flash files which I used here. The reason this was probably overlooked for so long is because no one expected the quality of the images in the Flash presentations to be any different from the other case files. Minermatt122514 (talk) 19:30, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
- Enginemen, there's a strange pattern over the other file (and the darker colors are more pronounced making his eyebrows look crazy big), I wonder if it's a photo of a CRT display. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:22, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
- That is what I am thinking. I noticed that the colors were significantly different. My theory is that the copies we've had here for a long time came from an analog source. The analog color standard in the U.S. is NTSC and people call it "Not Twice the Same Color" because of the color shifting. Also, there is generation loss to consider. Most of my higher quality ones are from the original generation. There were a few where I couldn't find that, so I used the best copy I could find instead. Minermatt122514 (talk) 23:04, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
- The version I learned is "Never The Same Color". The French SECAM stands for "Something Essentially Contradictory to the American Method" with PAL being "Perfection At Last". My guess however would be a (low quality? poorly calibrated?) computer CRT monitor. The lines appear to be very fine. NTSC is known for being good with skin tones, but those are clearly suffering. It seems more likely the photo was being displayed on a computer monitor rather than a TV, few computers had a TV-out and taking a photo of a live broadcast seems silly. It may also be harder to take a photo of a 60hz TV instead of a higher refresh rate computer monitor. It's all speculation of course, we can't know for sure. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:52, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
- That is what I am thinking. I noticed that the colors were significantly different. My theory is that the copies we've had here for a long time came from an analog source. The analog color standard in the U.S. is NTSC and people call it "Not Twice the Same Color" because of the color shifting. Also, there is generation loss to consider. Most of my higher quality ones are from the original generation. There were a few where I couldn't find that, so I used the best copy I could find instead. Minermatt122514 (talk) 23:04, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
- Enginemen, there's a strange pattern over the other file (and the darker colors are more pronounced making his eyebrows look crazy big), I wonder if it's a photo of a CRT display. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:22, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
File:Barbara Drummond.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Putitonamap98.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 02:47, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
File:Nathaniel Ledbetter.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Mpen320.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 15:25, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Nathaniel Ledbetter.png has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |